Should I make testnet support optional yet? This would allow for the creation of real darknets. Testnet nodes allow developers to log in remotely and fetch logs, force log level to minor, keep the last 1GB of compressed logs, regularly upload status to a central monitor, and cannot talk to non-testnet nodes.
0.7's memory usage is sufficiently low that IMHO many people may well run both testnet and real darknet nodes. So hopefully it wouldn't be a huge drain...? The problem is that 0.7 does not yet have any real security... - Fproxy does not filter anything. - Connection setup is vulnerable to MITM. - Requests are vulnerable to a whole range of attacks. So the question is, should I keep testnet forced to "on" for the time being? -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20060217/bdaf5820/attachment.pgp>
