* Dave Baker <dbkr at freenetproject.org> [2006-07-30 22:14:36]: > On Sunday 30 July 2006 21:28, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > [...] > > IMHO, freenet 0.7 can't run "well enough" on a pentium. I'm > > running a node on a pentium2 and I'm already short of resources. > > I'd say go for it. If someone is that desperate to run freenet on their P1, > they can go and fetch a different jar. > > > > > I've got one other idea: what about distributing > > YetAnotherJarfile with only optimized libraries ? > > > > one for windows, one for linux (half space gain) > > or one per processor type (including both linux and win32 libs : > > big space gain) > > > > any thought ? > > The issue with this is it means you can't necessarily, say, hide a CD in a > carrot cake and give it to your highly oppressed mate, since he needs > different optimised libraries. On a related issue, will the finished > installer have to download stuff? IIRC it did when I tried it, so that might > be an issue... >
The current one has an "offline" mode and the new one will be much simpler : there will be a "normal, online installer" and an offline "big bundle" NextGen$
