On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 08:38:35PM +0200, Lars Juel Nielsen wrote: > > I like the initial post but as Ian say it is overkill at least for > now. The problem is, how hard will it be to update it later to a > better solution if needed? > > As far as I can see Matthew's proposal cover any possible case, > including the one Ian argument for being the most likely which is > probably is too, but it's not 95% of all cases.
I'd prefer not to implement something that was way too simple, and have to complicate things later by keeping back-compatibility. But I don't see that it's a really urgent problem anyway; update from the web site does work, this is more of a strategic question. Certainly good to have for 0.7.0, but it's not necessary to have it for next week. Not that I'm saying it would take a week to implement. But I don't see any reason to implement something which is below the minimum which would be necessary to be used by FPI for auto-updating and a project freesite. -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20060519/f9af136e/attachment.pgp>
