David 'Bombe' Roden wrote: > On Sunday 28 May 2006 00:16, David McNab wrote: > >> CHK at aHk9P1BLcigiZjSqV2cUQtY5JNNWJbqBPwnZ3dM8Hy4,-4C87kRu4QB7Z5UmZpSpn >> iBlrmwJtDKr35AZ-m-jDEg,AAEC--8.txt > > Well, this is pretty ugly, if you ask me. From what you said on IRC I > thought you'd want something like CHK at aud32,fjewf,aaa/file.ext. Which I > would find much more logical: people can deduct from the filename what > it is (though the filename may be fake, of course) and fproxy can get a > filename for background downloading from it. Also, that is the way it > was with Freenet 0.5.
That's a semantic problem because the slash implies a multiplicity of items available within the one CHK. If you want a URI to be more self-explanatory, try something like: CHK at blahblah,yadayada.explicit_alien_pr0n.jpg That will work fine in the new node builds. -- Cheers David
