* Dave Baker <dbkr at freenetproject.org> [2006-10-15 20:57:57]:

> On Saturday 14 October 2006 12:57, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote:
> > Author: nextgens
> > Date: 2006-10-14 11:57:08 +0000 (Sat, 14 Oct 2006)
> > New Revision: 10661
> > 
> > Modified:
> >    trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/DarknetConnectionsToadlet.java
> > Log:
> > Small hack on fproxy to deny node removal if there isn't one week of 
> inactivity.
> 
> Is there a particular reason for this? Surely if a user is removing an active 
> node, they're doing it for a reason. This strikes me as very patronising.

Fighting against network churn... I'm not sure a big warning would be
efficient enough :|

Maybe I should even do a step forward : remove the "disable"
feature and let only BurstOnly and ListenOnly.

-- 
NextGen$. 
"On peut ob??r aux lois en souhaitant qu'elles changent, comme on sert ? la 
guerre en souhaitant la paix."
Merleau Ponty - L'?loge de la philosophie

Reply via email to