* Dave Baker <dbkr at freenetproject.org> [2006-10-15 20:57:57]: > On Saturday 14 October 2006 12:57, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > Author: nextgens > > Date: 2006-10-14 11:57:08 +0000 (Sat, 14 Oct 2006) > > New Revision: 10661 > > > > Modified: > > trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/DarknetConnectionsToadlet.java > > Log: > > Small hack on fproxy to deny node removal if there isn't one week of > inactivity. > > Is there a particular reason for this? Surely if a user is removing an active > node, they're doing it for a reason. This strikes me as very patronising.
Fighting against network churn... I'm not sure a big warning would be efficient enough :| Maybe I should even do a step forward : remove the "disable" feature and let only BurstOnly and ListenOnly. -- NextGen$. "On peut ob??r aux lois en souhaitant qu'elles changent, comme on sert ? la guerre en souhaitant la paix." Merleau Ponty - L'?loge de la philosophie