Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) wrote: > * Dave Baker <dbkr at freenetproject.org> [2006-10-15 20:57:57]: > >> On Saturday 14 October 2006 12:57, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: >>> Author: nextgens >>> Date: 2006-10-14 11:57:08 +0000 (Sat, 14 Oct 2006) >>> New Revision: 10661 >>> >>> Modified: >>> trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/DarknetConnectionsToadlet.java >>> Log: >>> Small hack on fproxy to deny node removal if there isn't one week of >> inactivity. >> >> Is there a particular reason for this? Surely if a user is removing an >> active >> node, they're doing it for a reason. This strikes me as very patronising. > > Fighting against network churn... I'm not sure a big warning would be > efficient enough :| > > Maybe I should even do a step forward : remove the "disable" > feature and let only BurstOnly and ListenOnly.
Please do not do that. What if i suspect one of my friends of being not really a friend, i'll have to delete my own node to disconnect from an in that case. That will surely create more of a churn, and will probably cause people to leave freenet all the way. -- http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Voice of Freedom, Radical Podcast http://freeselfdefence.info/ Self-defence wiki "None of us are free until all of us are free." ~ Mihail Bakunin
