On 25 Sep 2006, at 16:05, toad wrote: > ----- Forwarded message from Oskar Sandberg > <oskar at freenetproject.org> ----- > > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-26) on servalan > X-Spam-Level: > X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham > version=3.1.4 > Envelope-to: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org > Delivery-date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:54:09 +0100 > From: Oskar Sandberg <oskar at freenetproject.org> > To: toad <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> > Subject: Re: [toad at amphibian.dyndns.org: Re: [freenet-dev] Open net > - initial > design ideas] > > toad wrote: >> So we force the distribution? Hmmm. We don't have to force the >> distribution if we path fold on successful requests, but forcing >> it is >> better in that it will almost certainly work regardless of e.g. local >> traffic levels. > > I don't get it? Why would you want to try to pick links explicitely > according to a given distribution, when we know that just choosing the > destination of incoming queries should work fine. Did I miss > something?
Its not necessary, it is just to help things along - it should work fine without it. Ian. Ian Clarke: Co-Founder & Chief Scientist Revver, Inc. phone: 323.871.2828 | personal blog - http://locut.us/blog -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20060925/01abb3ab/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20060925/01abb3ab/attachment.pgp>
