Florent Daigni?re wrote: > * batosai <batosai at batosai.net> [2007-08-13 10:35:49]: > >> Edgar Friendly a ?crit : >>> It's probably a weakness in the parser - the node parses CSS and HTML >>> completely, stripping out any potentially harmful content. I'm guessing >>> that the potential for a "-" was missed, and can be added pretty easily, >>> now that the problem is found. Do you have an example document that >>> shouldn't be blocked? >> Here is an example document. Negative margins are used in : >> >> - #content : for centering the page regardless of the browser. >> - .left .right : for overlapping outside of the page. >> > >> Example using negative margins >> >> This page uses negative margins for centering (margin:auto isn't accepted by >> lazy browsers) and block overlaping. > > Hmm, according to > http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/box.html#margin-properties it should be > either a width or a percentage ... as far as I know widths are always > positive. > > Do we really want the CSS parser to be more flexible ? > > NextGen$ > yes, lower on that page, section 8.3.1 has text: ... In the case of negative margins, ... And there are real uses for them, they're supported by browsers, so yes, we want a (slightly) more flexible parser.
E.
