----- Anonymous ----- 2007.08.15 - 08:30:52GMT -----
node 1
darknet only
Uptime 1h30m
connection 10/10 Mbit/s
Runs on Ubuntu 7.04 64bit
dual core 2.9 GhZ CPU
max allowed Java RAM 512MB
Peer statistics
* Connected: 2
* Backed off: 8
* Disconnected: 1
Bandwidth
* Total Output: 343 MiB (65.1 KiB/sec)
* Payload Output: 285 MiB (54.1 KiB/sec)(83%)
* Total Input: 226 MiB (42.9 KiB/sec)
* Output Rate: 71.3 KiB/sec (of 1.0 MiB)
* Input Rate: 64.5 KiB/sec (of 1.0 MiB)
*********************** *****************************
node 2
runs 24/7
darknet+opennet
Same 10/10 connection as node 1
Ubuntu 7.04 (32bit)
2.0 GhZ CPU
max allowed Java mem: 512 MB
Peer statistics
* Connected: 17
* Backed off: 10
* Disconnected: 1
Bandwidth
* Total Output: 4.50 GiB (86.9 KiB/sec)
* Payload Output: 3.67 GiB (70.8 KiB/sec)(81%)
* Total Input: 3.35 GiB (64.6 KiB/sec)
* Output Rate: 44.7 KiB/sec (of 1.0 MiB)
* Input Rate: 56.0 KiB/sec (of 1.0 MiB)
*****************
*************************
Looks like my nodes are doing great, I never had that kind of Freenet traffic
before.
The hybrid node used to have ~50out/35in KiB/s
The darknet-only node was more like 30out and 25in
I guess the difference is because the hybrid node has more peers and it stays
up more (just a guess tough: if you know the real reason I'd gladly hear
that)
Today (8/15) I saw this unusually high values for the second time, first time
was last night but I waited before sharing, in case it didn't last; now it
has been like that for at least 9-10 hours.
I hope those readings real and not the result of some false-reading bug, and I
also hope that Freenet is actually uning that bandwidth for something more
than background noise.
If it's real and it's "good" traffic (and of course, if it doesn't go back
down with next build), my node's throughput has doubled.
What about you guys?
How do your stats look?
Noticed any change in upload/download speed?
Do freesites load more/less quickly?
For me, it feel kinda faster but I can't really tell yet, I haven0t used
Freenet so much since I noticed this BW usage increment; I'll post my
impressions when I get some more definite ones.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070815/93692c0d/attachment.pgp>
