Matthew Toseland wrote: > I'm not sure that that is the main problem we have to deal with right now. My > suspicion is that pre-emptive rejection is fine, but we're not being sent > enough requests in the first place.
Cool, I see what you mean now - I'd been thinking in terms of replacing both backoff and pre-emptive rejection but I guess it makes sense to replace backoff first and see if that solves the problem. Cheers, Michael
