On Saturday 08 December 2007 21:48, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > * toad at freenetproject.org <toad at freenetproject.org> [2007-12-08 > 17:15:56]: > > > Author: toad > > Date: 2007-12-08 17:15:56 +0000 (Sat, 08 Dec 2007) > > New Revision: 16403 > > > > Modified: > > trunk/freenet/src/freenet/io/NetworkInterface.java > > Log: > > ignoreUnbindable -> ignoreUnbindableIP6, and change it to implement that. > > > > In that patch you are denaturing ignoreUnbindable... That's *bad*. Its > purpose was to allow services to spawn up on some interfaces even if > binding on others was not possible. How is that related to ipv6 ?
Because that's not what we want. If port 8888 isn't available we don't want fproxy to load on port 8888. IIRC the ONLY purpose of ignoreUnbindable was to workaround the fact that you added IPv6 addresses to the default bind list for all the services. > > NextGen$ > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20071210/c5395879/attachment.pgp>
