I think that we do want to imply that opennet is insecure. It IS insecure. Just less insecure than the public internet. Keep in mind, we strongly want to encourage people to connect to the darknet, but because it -is- more secure, and because it makes the network stronger/more resilient.
I think that "minimally protected" and "turn on Secure mode", emphasize that they are better off than the public internet, but not yet where they should be. Julien Cornuwel wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Colin Davis a ?crit : > >> Your Freenet node is only minimally protected. Your machine is currently >> hiding from most people, but it's doing so by connecting to strangers. >> If you connect to friends you already know and trust, Freenet will be >> better able to protect you. >> >> Please get some connections to people you trust, and add them to your >> Friends page as soon as possible. >> Once you have at least 10 Friends, turn on Secure mode and your node >> will become invisible to the outside world. >> > > Seems to me that "Secure mode" still implies that opennet is insecure. > What about "Invisible mode" ? > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFHYsXEo6N05NzaOvURAiW9AJ4oSg3gr9sw35ZS9UQbnRqL9hjmtQCfcISA > 3u1ETv0sCpgaWms0yWpcZuQ= > =96+p > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl >
