-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Matthew Toseland a ?crit :
>> I'm not sure using the words "Insecure" and "Please get some >> connections" are a good thing. Opennet is not that insecure. > > Yes it is. It is very easy to find all nodes. It is relatively easy to > surveil > those nodes that you are connected to and determine what (of big files) is > local and what is remote. And it is relatively easy to search the entire > network for the originator of specific content by starting off far from them, > and using what you know from the locations of those requests that reach you, > to gradually narrow down the possible authors. Maybe my opinion about opennet was a bit too high : I thought it was as secure as Freenet 0.5. Which, while not being perfect, was quite good. > What about: > > Freenet is running in insecure mode: It is (relatively) easy for an attacker > to find out that you are running a node, connect to it, or even trace your > requests. You can dramatically improve your security by adding connections to > people you trust through the Friends page. When you have at least 10 Friends, > please turn off insecure mode and your node will become invisible to the > outside world. OK for me. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHYu9Jo6N05NzaOvURAg5GAKCVZZk65TpL3fz8AxOjuFNRPyWn/gCgx7s0 wz8DPfhuCYbXYYr1zwQILlo= =TS7m -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
