On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 09:59:39PM +0000, Volodya wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Many of the simulations showed that throttling without backoff was > > superior to throttling with backoff. Backoff is intended to prevent > > throttling from throttling the whole network down to nothing because of > > a small number of very slow nodes causing lots of failures when too many > > requests are routed to them. > > Thanks for the answer. > > I still am lost as to why all my connections are backed off. I have noticed > that shutting > down everything but freenet makes the problem less. At least for a couple of > hours after > start up. My CPU usage is at 100% all the time currently, so i think that it > might be > because my node just doesn't comprehend what is being asked of it fast enough > and > therefore it backs the peers off. This in turn creates the state where all > the peers are > backed off and thus no place to rout through, something very weird begins to > happen after > that, i am still looking for any correlation between what i've been doing and > the node's > performance.
So the 100% cpu usage, which appears to be caused by lots of GCing, causes the backoffs? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070203/c113dea9/attachment.pgp>
