On Wednesday 25 July 2007 16:15, Alberto Bacchelli wrote: > Well, now we have a comparison between the two classes :) > What should we do? Move to an extended BitSet or remain using BitArray? > In the latter case: what about the bug?
Move to an extended BitSet, assuming that doing so doesn't require any post-1.4 functionality. However this can safely be filed as a bug and forgotten about for a while as far as I am concerned. > > Thank you! > > Sback > > Matthew Toseland wrote: > > On Monday 23 July 2007 09:45, bbackde at googlemail.com wrote: > >>> setAllOnes() to set all bits true, > >> > >> maybe use BitSet.set(int fromIndex, int toIndex) with fromIndex=0 and > >> toIndex=BitSet.size() -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070725/0a704b09/attachment.pgp>
