On Thursday 24 May 2007 21:05, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > * Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2007-05-24 20:31:37]: > > That's sensible, but don't we do it already? > > No, we were waiting for 5 mins or so before doing the first detection.
Not if we have no peers iirc. > > > IMHO the range of circumstances in which we'd want to run UP&P is > > considerably wider than the range of circumstances in which we'd want to > > run STUN: UP&P can quite happily run on every startup (if the user has > > indicated the LAN is safe). > > I don't see any valid reason to prioritize up&p over stun. Because UP&P does not make us harvestable. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070524/22981dba/attachment.pgp>
