On Monday 28 May 2007 06:44, Edgar Friendly wrote: > Matthew Toseland wrote: > > If we receive the key, we send it (FNPSubscribeData[SSK]) to all the > > peers who are in the list of nodes for that key in the failure table, > > cache it, and delete the failure table entry. We don't send them all at > > once: We have a queue of keys we currently want to send. > > snip > > > Implementation difficulties: > > - We should have a global map of all keys that clients are interested in, > > and check this whenever we get a key. (This is probably a good idea > > anyway). > > Nodes will have to keep track of what requests they are subscribed for, > otherwise they'll have to accept any data sent to them FNPSubscribeData, > and this mechanism could be used to push unwanted data (flooding a > store?). This check might be done by simply looking in that global map.
Right. (Welcome back btw). -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070529/14f17820/attachment.pgp>
