Here's another improving-0.5 paper, which I don't entirely understand as it doesn't seem to fully specify the algorithms tested, although it claims impressive gains in path length. It's all ultimately derived from the observation that freenet improves much less quickly if there are many requests and few inserts than if there are equal numbers.
http://csdl2.computer.org/persagen/DLAbsToc.jsp?resourcePath=/dl/proceedings/&toc=comp/proceedings/hicss/2004/2056/09/2056toc.xml&DOI=10.1109/HICSS.2004.1265683 On Thursday 22 November 2007 11:03, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Looks like a combination of some variant on NGR (vivee has done research > suggesting something like NGR could work), and Bloom filters. Both ideas are > old, but they probably have some new variant on them. They claim a 30x > increase in hits ratio and 6x transfer rate. > > Bloom filters aren't that difficult, the problem is that we can't implement > them prior to premix routing and still have any realistic anonymity against > local attackers. Maybe the paper's "fuzzy" proposal helps. > > Anyway, I haven't actually bought/read the article yet. > > http://csdl2.computer.org/persagen/DLAbsToc.jsp?resourcePath=/dl/proceedings/&toc=comp/proceedings/ccgrid/2006/2585/02/2585toc.xml&DOI=10.1109/CCGRID.2006.136 > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20071122/ea20823e/attachment.pgp>
