On Monday 28 April 2008 16:18, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > * toad at freenetproject.org <toad at freenetproject.org> [2008-04-28 > 14:28:50]: > > > Author: toad > > Date: 2008-04-28 14:28:49 +0000 (Mon, 28 Apr 2008) > > New Revision: 19582 > > > > Modified: > > trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/FirstTimeWizardToadlet.java > > Log: > > Change default to assume that we're on 256kbps. > > > > Huh ? > > What has changed since we agreed on using 128kbps ? > > That will significantly impair the performances and general browsing > experience of users using a slower link!
And significantly increase performance for users using at least a 256kbps link. Optimise the common case! However, we should probably reduce the actual limits to half the specified upload speed, i.e. from 24 to 16 for 256kbps. Exactly how common are broadband connections with less than 256kbps upstream? Anyone got one? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080428/9504748c/attachment.pgp>
