* Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2008-08-01 19:31:35]:
> On Tuesday 22 July 2008 17:52, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > Author: nextgens > > Date: 2008-07-22 16:52:25 +0000 (Tue, 22 Jul 2008) > > New Revision: 21320 > > > > Modified: > > trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/NodeDispatcher.java > > Log: > > Implement the FOAF-attack-mitigation hack > > IMHO we should accept the new location but ignore the FOAF locations, no? > > It can't happen from a genuine node; imho it makes sense to prune that node out of routing altogether (and that's what happens as a side effect of not accepting any location from it). -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080801/81804913/attachment.pgp>
