* Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2008-08-02 02:10:35]:
> On Thursday 17 July 2008 18:04, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote:
> > Author: nextgens
> > Date: 2008-07-17 17:04:05 +0000 (Thu, 17 Jul 2008)
> > New Revision: 21173
> >
> > Modified:
> > trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/PeerManager.java
> > trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/PeerNode.java
> > Log:
> > more on FOAF routing changes: exclude peers from the list we send if
> > - they have been backed off for more than 5mins
> > OR - they have a 90+% backoff percentage
> >
> > shall we consider using the uptime too?
> >
> > Modified: trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/PeerManager.java
> > ===================================================================
> > --- trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/PeerManager.java 2008-07-17 15:50:11 UTC
> (rev 21172)
> > +++ trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/PeerManager.java 2008-07-17 17:04:05 UTC
> (rev 21173)
> > @@ -558,7 +558,7 @@
> > * @return An array of the current locations (as doubles) of all
> > * our connected peers.
> > */
> > - public double[] getPeerLocationDoubles() {
> > + public double[] getPeerLocationDoubles(boolean pruneBackedOffedPeers) {
>
> Do we actually use this boolean?
>
As of r21579 we do... but its value is always true: do we want to get
rid of it?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080802/d3483b5c/attachment.pgp>
