On Aug 14 2008, Daniel Cheng wrote: >The store is also encrypted with a per-store key. >In case of emergency, >just erasing the key from disk would make the whole store unusable. > >Overwriting 16 bytes is far easier then overwriting the whole store. > >I am not sure if this worth the effort, but this is the reason behind it.
Encrypting the store definitely makes sense but isn't it orthogonal to the question of whether the routing keys should be stored in the (encrypted or not) store? Sorry if I'm missing something. Cheers, Michael
