Matthew Toseland skrev: > On Friday 12 December 2008 09:55, David ?Bombe? Roden wrote: > >> On Thursday 11 December 2008 22:53:54 Tommy[D] wrote: >> >> >>> If those users without javascript have no big disadvantages, this is ok >>> > for > >>> me. >>> >> We wouldn?t need JavaScript at all. A simple http-refresh would suffice. >> Reload the page in 10, 20, 40, 90 seconds and if the data is there, show it, >> otherwise just show the page again. >> > > Except that in many cases it will load in less than 10 seconds and therefore > we have significantly reduced the performance of the node. IMHO we need a > 1-second refresh; whether this is attainable is an open question. OTOH with > javascript we could refresh in real time and not cost any significant > performance. >
1-second HTTP refreshes won't be a good idea if the node is not on LAN :-/. Javascript is probably better then. - Zero3
