On Monday 15 December 2008 20:35, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Matthew Toseland > <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: > > Nextgens would certainly object to running Microsoft provided binaries on emu, > > and I can see his point. > > ...which is? > > We're the Freenet Project, not the "anti-Microsoft" project. If using > some Microsoft code helps us to offer a better piece of software to > our users then why wouldn't we?
We shouldn't need to run the signature process on emu. If we build an online installer, we could build the installer manually on Windows, or on another box. Even if we provide an offline installer updated on every build, that could still be built on a developer's box rather than on emu. > > Ian. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20081215/3ddd0e33/attachment.pgp>
