On Tuesday 05 February 2008 20:21, Michael Rogers wrote: > Robert Hailey wrote: > > First, there is an equal chance of nodes from either network swapping. > > In the freenet network (since swapping is done through the network) it > > is not equal (if for no other cause than the scarce links between the > > two networks). > > I was under the impression that the random walks for swapping were long > enough to reach any node with roughly equal probability - I believe that > was Oskar's intention. If the random walks aren't escaping from local > clusters then we'll never be able to smooth out the clusters...
Yes and no - in the case of poorly connected networks, the sheer capacity of the limited connections between the two networks produces a bias, doesn't it? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080205/814a94da/attachment.pgp>
