* Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2008-01-03 15:25:55]:
> On Saturday 29 December 2007 13:34, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > Author: nextgens > > Date: 2007-12-29 13:34:33 +0000 (Sat, 29 Dec 2007) > > New Revision: 16839 > > > > Modified: > > trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/FNPPacketMangler.java > > Log: > > jfk: Fix the issue spotted by robert (see > http://archives.freenetproject.org/message/20071229.105331.b1a491f0.en.html) > > > > That might solve the "I've lost the exponential" problem > > It might? Wouldn't the old code cause an NPE? Well that's a fix-of-a-fix-of-a-fix, so yes, I won't dare saying it will fix it. No it wouldn't cause an npe... because of the way we instanciate the class... but it's a good practice to check for null there. If it was causing NPEs we would have spotted it earlier ;) NextGen$ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080103/ff62597d/attachment.pgp>
