On Jan 2, 2008, at 7:38 AM, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
>> Why not just use if(isConnected()) { ... } ? As far as I can see
>> that is
>> correct: if we're not connected, we don't care about verified*.
>
> You're suggesting to revert robert's patch, wich is fine by me... as I
> said, I don't understand why it helps
>
> NextGen$
On Jan 3, 2008, at 9:19 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Please restore the original version. It looks like it was correct
> after all,
> and the problem is not fetching ARKs when verified*=true.
If you really want me to, I certainly will, but... if you and nextgens
agree that it is benign to active connections, and in my reasoning
prevents a deadlock for long disconnections... why? I think that it
would be more useful to simply rename the identifiers to be more
intuitive until the ark problem is solved to your satisfaction (e.g.
as David said he may).
--
Robert Hailey
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080103/a3bc7665/attachment.html>
