On Friday 04 January 2008 16:23, Robert Hailey wrote: > > On Jan 4, 2008, at 8:53 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > location > 1.0 is possible if the node set it too high and told us, > > no? > > No... AFAICS currentLocation is private, the only time it is not set > to a constant (-1) is from "Location.getLocation(locationString);" or > "updateLocation(double newLoc);". > > updateLocation() has an explicit guard against setting it beyond 0&1, > and getLocation() will throw a parse exception if it is beyond 0&1. > > In fact, rather than setting currentLocation to -1, we could probably > set isRoutable=false and it would be even simpler.
Good idea - but won't it get reset? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080104/5c5bfb97/attachment.pgp>
