* Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2008-03-19 11:55:30]:
> On Wednesday 19 March 2008 00:56, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > * Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2008-03-18 18:12:39]: > > > > > On Sunday 16 March 2008 12:14, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > > > Author: nextgens > > > > Date: 2008-03-16 12:14:56 +0000 (Sun, 16 Mar 2008) > > > > New Revision: 18552 > > > > > > > > Added: > > > > trunk/apps/new_installer/res/firefox_profile/chrome/ > > > > trunk/apps/new_installer/res/firefox_profile/chrome/userChrome.css > > > > Log: > > > > new_installer: don't show menus the user has no use of > > > > > > Like the Bookmarks menu? Why? > > > > Because we don't want them to use this profile to browse the internet? > > (they would end up reactivating cookies, javascript, ...) > > Bookmarks are per-profile, so there's no threat there. It's not a matter of bookmarks. We don't want users to be tempted to change the profile's configuration so that they can browse the internet. Hiding menus is a good way to prevent them from doing so. > > > Because we want people to use the bookmark feature of fproxy? > > So? It's not about threats... it's about ensuring the data people are interrested in will remain on the network. Most newbies don't know about data-persistence related matters on freenet. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080319/0143848c/attachment.pgp>
