* Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2008-03-19 11:56:29]:

> On Wednesday 19 March 2008 01:06, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > * Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2008-03-18 18:10:54]:
> > 
> > > On Sunday 16 March 2008 10:29, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote:
> > > > Author: nextgens
> > > > Date: 2008-03-16 10:29:28 +0000 (Sun, 16 Mar 2008)
> > > > New Revision: 18550
> > > > 
> > > > Added:
> > > >    trunk/apps/new_installer/res/firefox_profile/extensions.rdf
> > > > Log:
> > > > new_installer: force-disable skype's extension... yeah that sucks but 
> > > > as 
> > > long as I don't find a way to whitelist allowed extensions it will remain 
> > > like that
> > > > 
> > > > Added: trunk/apps/new_installer/res/firefox_profile/extensions.rdf
> > > > ===================================================================
> > > > --- trunk/apps/new_installer/res/firefox_profile/extensions.rdf         
> > > >                 
> > > (rev 0)
> > > > +++ trunk/apps/new_installer/res/firefox_profile/extensions.rdf 
> 2008-03-16 
> > > 10:29:28 UTC (rev 18550)
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> > > > +<?xml version="1.0"?>
> > > > +<!-- see http://forum.skype.com/index.php?showtopic=81027 :(( -->
> > > 
> > > Block it because it overrides the homepage? I thought the problem was it 
> > > rewrites HTML to make telephone numbers clickable, and that that might be 
> > > exploitable to get around the HTML filter?
> > 
> > Both are good reasons to block it.
> > 
> > Overriding the homepage the way it does it means "not displaying the
> > wizard anymore", effectively "breaking" the installer... and that's why
> > I blocked it.
> > 
> > What we really need is a way to whitelist allowed extensions... but as far
> > as I know we can't do that with firefox :/
> > 
> > Dealing with extensions mangling the HTML code is still an ongoing
> > task... and I'm effraid there's no solution to deal with them short of
> > trying to auto-generate the extension blacklisting file or starting FF
> > in safe-mode.
> 
> Have you tried asking the firefox people? On irc.mozilla.org ...

Noone was able to answer me on #firefox but if you want to retry be my
guest. IRC and especially a public support channel aren't exactly a good way 
of getting accurate informations about such a precise usecase.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080319/7197558c/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to