On Thursday 20 March 2008 20:37, Guido wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 20. M?rz 2008 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > > On Thursday 20 March 2008 19:51, guido wrote: > > > For me, this build has brought a significant drop in the load caused by > > > freenet on my machine. Until now, running freenet has always caused an > > > average load of at least 4, slowing down everything else on this box. > > > After this upgrade, the load is a much more bearable 0.2, and everything > > > else has become much snappier. > > > > This is very odd. It's probably back to normal with 1126? Is this load due > > to CPU or disk access i.e. how high is your typical CPU usage? > > I think you did not read my message right. I said the load /dropped/ from > unreasonably high to reasonably low. This is a good thing, and I really hope > it won't go "back to normal" again with 1126.
1125 had some major problems, it is likely that 1126 will again use lots of whatever it was using. > > The load used to be mainly IO (disk access) and memory usage (causing the > machine to swap). It's still swapping, but this time that doesn't seem to > have that much of an impact on the overall load. Java and swapping go together *really* badly. I suppose if you reduce the memory limit you get OOMs and 100% CPU usage? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080320/0b9b7559/attachment.pgp>
