On Sunday 23 March 2008 21:14, Julien Cornuwel wrote: > Joel C. Salomon a ?crit : > > > An alternative could be to give the freenet daemon permission to > > update itself, and decouple the package version from the freenet > > release version. That will require update-over-mandatory, or giving > > the daemon the smarts to connect to freenetproject.org when needed. > > IMHO, the update should be done over Freenet (as it is already). The > package should just ease the first installation. > > If Freenet becomes illegal (and I think it will), the update should keep > working even if the official site is shut down.
If it does, we can provide apt-get-over-freenet. :) > > Just my 2 cents. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080324/990f267b/attachment.pgp>
