On Monday 12 May 2008 23:10, Michael Rogers wrote: > Victor Denisov wrote: > > Input Rate: 17.6 KiB/sec (of 300 KiB) > > Output Rate: 15.9 KiB/sec (of 200 KiB) > > Total Input: 4.83 GiB (28.3 KiB/sec) > > Total Output: 5.66 GiB (33.2 KiB/sec) > > > > Used Java memory: 122 MiB > > Allocated Java memory: 127 MiB > > Maximum Java memory: 284 MiB > > Running threads: 152/700 > > > > So, basically, network had grown about 3x after 0.7 release. My node has > > been up for 2 days, and is pretty well established in the network. It's > > not overloaded (CPU usage is ~ 5-10%). Yet it doesn't use more than > > about 15% of the allowed bandwidth, on average. > > If the average speed of a node is, say, 20 KB/s then your node's > unlikely to be able to use 300 KB/s because its peers won't be > sending/accepting enough traffic (due to their own bandwidth limits, not > yours). This could be solved by allowing fast nodes to have more peers, > but of course that creates the possibility of ubernodes.
It could also be solved to a degree by a different load management scheme that allowed us more fine grained control over the degree to which ubernodes can take more requests... But a) that's probably too big a job for 0.7.1, and b) the current system seems to more or less work. > > Cheers, > Michael -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080513/f2fb54bd/attachment.pgp>
