On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Ian Clarke <ian.clarke at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 5:34 AM, Daniel Cheng <j16sdiz+freenet at gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Ian Clarke <ian.clarke at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Matthew Toseland >>> <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: >>>> As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might >>>> want >>>> to review this before I apply it. >>> >>> You know, I wish you guys would at least try using that Smartbear >>> software, this is *exactly* what it is designed for and makes >>> code-review much easier. >> >> Atlassian Crucible is designed for code reviewing too. Their software >> are well integrated with subversion. They offer their whole stack of >> softwares to any open source project for free on request. > > Do you have personal experience of working with Crucible? I don't > have personal experience of working with Smartbear, but people I trust > do and highly recommend it (and they were at least as dismissive as > Toad and Nextgens are being to begin with).
(According to what I have seen) Crucible is not as good as Smartbear, but it can be integrated with other Atlassian products (see http://www.atlassian.com/software/development.jsp), which I love to use. OTOH, if we want some participation from the anonymous freenet communities, keeping the existing review-on-maillist workflow and build a maillist-to-fms/freemail gateway is probably a better choice. Daniel
