On Wednesday 12 November 2008 13:19, Volodya wrote: > Matthew Toseland wrote: > > The one and only Freenet search index has been updated, apparently on > > Saturday. So we now have a maintained XMLLibrarian index again. I dunno how > > he managed it given the bugs reported and apparently not yet fixed in the > > spider. I have updated it in XMLLibrarian's default index, and also added it > > to the default bookmarks list. > > > > What priority should we give to: > > 1) Fixing any remaining serious bugs in XMLSpider? (Most likely client layer > > bugs that should not be tackled before db4o is merged)? > > 2) Integrating XMLLibrarian into the Browse Freenet page as a search box? > > 3) Supporting XMLLibrarian search boxes in freesites? > > 4) Supporting multiple indexes, adding indexes from freesites etc? > > > > Most of these are fairly easy items. > > Most probably a lot of people who say "there is not enough content on Freenet > for me" would be less likely to say that if presented with the ability to search. > > I doubt that old-timers will really care one way or another (i probably won't), > but new user retention will increase.
In other words it's really really important? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20081112/77eaa6e7/attachment.pgp>
