On Sunday 16 November 2008 05:14, xor at freenetproject.org wrote: > Author: xor > Date: 2008-11-16 05:14:40 +0000 (Sun, 16 Nov 2008) > New Revision: 23638 > > Modified: > trunk/plugins/WoT/introduction/captcha/ReCaptchaFactory.java > Log: > More ideas. > > Modified: trunk/plugins/WoT/introduction/captcha/ReCaptchaFactory.java > =================================================================== > --- trunk/plugins/WoT/introduction/captcha/ReCaptchaFactory.java > 2008-11-16 04:51:58 UTC (rev 23637) > +++ trunk/plugins/WoT/introduction/captcha/ReCaptchaFactory.java > 2008-11-16 05:14:40 UTC (rev 23638) > @@ -17,6 +17,9 @@ > * We could also ask the recaptcha people to run their own seed identity for us which provides insane amounts of captchas per day. > * > * First thing we could do: Just implement the ReCaptchaFactory without anonymization and make our seed identity only insert recaptchas. > + * We would have to change the KSK at which to insert captcha solutions to include the hash of the solution an not the solution itself because > + * ReCaptcha cannot give away the solution as they only check one of the two words in the captcha. This could be done by extending the > + * class IntroductionPuzzle.
How would hashing help? It's a dictionary attack, versus ... a dictionary attack? > * > * Description: > * reCAPTCHA improves the process of digitizing books by sending words that cannot be read by computers to the Web in the form of CAPTCHAs -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20081125/c0c858db/attachment.pgp>
