> > Modified: trunk/plugins/WoT/Config.java
> > ===================================================================
> > --- trunk/plugins/WoT/Config.java 2008-09-23 11:10:42 UTC
> (rev 22760)
> > +++ trunk/plugins/WoT/Config.java 2008-09-23 11:10:49 UTC
> (rev 22761)
> > @@ -19,19 +19,14 @@
> > */
> > public class Config {
> >
> > - private ObjectContainer db;
> > private HashMap<String, String> params = null;
> >
> > /**
> > *
> > * @param db The database where the configuration is stored.
> > */
> > - public Config(ObjectContainer db) {
> > + public Config() {
> >
> > - // TODO Refactor this : the database shouldn't
> try to store its own reference
> > - // The ObjectContainer should be passed to
> set/get/... methodes
> > -
> > - this.db = db;
> > if(params == null) {
> > params = new HashMap<String, String>();
> > initDefault(false);
> > @@ -46,7 +41,6 @@
> > */
> > public synchronized void set(String key, String value) {
> > params.put(key, value);
> > - db.store(params);
> > }
>
> Did you test this ? Last time I tried this, db4o wasn't
> storing inner complex objects and I had to manually store them.
>
> See contexts and properties in Identity.java.
> If this really isn't necessary, you can remove it from there too.
I did not test it. I thought that one part of the use of db4o is that
you do not have to store inner complex objects manually?
Is it maybe possible to do this with db4o somehow?
