* Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2008-10-29 23:17:01]:
> On Wednesday 29 October 2008 21:14, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > * Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2008-10-29 13:30:48]: > > > > > On Wednesday 29 October 2008 03:50, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > > > * Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2008-10-29 00:12:24]: > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday 28 October 2008 19:47, nextgens at freenetproject.org > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Author: nextgens > > > > > > Date: 2008-10-28 19:47:26 +0000 (Tue, 28 Oct 2008) > > > > > > New Revision: 23162 > > > > > > > > > > > > Modified: > > > > > > trunk/freenet/src/freenet/client/ArchiveManager.java > > > > > > Log: > > > > > > fix bug #2667: Trunk: many old sites seem unretrievable > > > > > > > > > > Why is this necessary? What if a site went to a zip and then got > gzipped > > > on > > > > > top? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'cause of the stupid metadata format you've chosen :) > > > > > > > > compressionType = 0 is GZIP... and that happens to be the default, > > > > meaning that uncompressed ZIPs are/were advertizing ZIP+GZIP > > > > > > But we explicitly set -1 if it's not compressed ... so are you saying > > > that > > > ZIPs were never compressed with gzip, so there's no problem? > > > > No, we weren't setting it to -1; read the code you wrote ;) > > > Doh. Well, the question is, are some freesites gzipped zips and some > non-gzipped zips, with no metadata difference? Or are they all non-gzipped > zips? They are all non-gzipped zips except a few inserted with unreleased code. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20081030/d2006a29/attachment.pgp>
