On Friday 03 April 2009 09:31:06 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Am Freitag 03 April 2009 02:22:05 schrieb Daniel Cheng: > > DVCS does _NOT_ means accepting anonymous contribution. > > > > However, if we want to, there is nothing stopping us. > > Personally I think it important for freenet to slowly establish a workflow > where people contribute pseudonymously, because that will build a group of > trusted committers which will be essential should freenet ever be outlawed. > > Also that will open the way to a seamless transition to completely freenet- > based development. > > For that workflow freenet needs to use a DVCS.
Agreed, however we need to be careful as we can be sued for any code which is copyrighted by somebody else; if we can provide the would-be litigant with the identity of the committer, we don't have this problem. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090404/d12adbfa/attachment.pgp>
