Long CHK keys are ok for me, most important is that they are static and all inserts produces the same key. Will the CHK keys have a fix length?
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 03:06, Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: > On Thursday 23 April 2009 21:14:01 guido wrote: >> Am Donnerstag 23 April 2009 14:48:43 schrieb Matthew Toseland: >> > I would really appreciate input on option 2 i.e. how much of a problem are >> > long CHKs? >> >> If CHK key lengths as they are now are not bad enough to keep people from >> using them, then making them 50% longer won't be, either. > > Twice as long. >> >> Besides, making the pathname of the file a mandatory part of the key is > already >> having larger impact on average key lengths then this would. > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > -- __________________________________________________ GnuPG key: (0x48DBFA8A) Keyserver: pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de Fingerprint: 477D F057 1BD4 1AE7 8A54 8679 6690 E2EC 48DB FA8A __________________________________________________
