On Sunday 16 August 2009 16:38:15 NextGen$ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What are you doing here? starting an edit-war on the bug tracker?
> Editing the priority/milestone of loads of tickets won't help to get them
> implemented... and it is spamming our inboxes (I'm still subscribed to
> most, like most of us).
>

- People are complaining about the bug tracker being bloated and unusable, 
therefore I'm trying to work 1hour+ every day on cleaning it up. That is good, 
isn't it?

- As you've experienced, all changes I am doing are being reported by mail to 
the other developers, so I am not doing anything hidden, it is publicly 
reviewed. So if you do not agree with any of my changes, feel free to revert 
them.

- When setting milestones/target versions/priorities, of course that is a 
*suggestion* by me, and I only do it for issue where I am very certain about 
it. I want to help in getting an overview of what might be nice for 0.8.If you 
do not agree, please revert.

> Changing the priority of tickets you've no business with whatsoever (you're
> neither a reporter, not a contributor to that part of the code, nor even
> subscribed to the ticket) is just unacceptable.

I am only changing the issues which seem easy to judge for a non-fred-core-
developer. I consider this as very useful: People who have deep knowledge in 
how the node works should spend their time on doing stuff where that knowledge 
is *required* - it would suck very much if toad had to spend his time on 
resolving trivial issues which someone who has absolutely no knowledge of the 
node's internals (such as me) can resolve!

Anyway, as you've been demanding to drop all contents of the bugtracker - I 
think it's better if a person who has "no business with whatsoever" cleans it 
up than just having all of the bugtracker be deleted.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090816/97225f7c/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to