On Friday 21 August 2009 19:16:15 xor wrote: > On Friday 21 August 2009 19:11:43 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > 1231: > > - Increase the maximum peers limit and make it scale with your upstream > > bandwidth. 11 peers at 10KB/sec, 15 at 20KB/sec, 19 at 30KB/sec, 26 at > > 60KB/sec, 34 at 100KB/sec and 40 and 140KB/sec. Show the limit on the > > stats page. > > - When changing the store type (most notably when setting the store size > > in the first time wizard), don't stall for minutes or more preallocating > > the datastore - do it in the background. IMHO this was a serious problem > > for new users with a lot of disk space. > > Cool. I guess this should be published to the freenetproject.org news. And > you can mark that one as implemented: > > http://freenet.uservoice.com/pages/8861-general/suggestions/93039-release- > the-20-nodes-barrier?ref=titl
Another idea: Maybe we should even brag about having implemented the #1 request on uservoice - not only for the purpose of bragging but also for getting more attention on uservoice. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090821/78da468e/attachment.pgp>
