On Wednesday 25 February 2009 09:57:25 Florent Daigniere wrote: > Matthew Toseland wrote: > > On Thursday 29 January 2009 17:12:57 nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > >> Author: nextgens > >> Date: 2009-01-29 17:12:57 +0000 (Thu, 29 Jan 2009) > >> New Revision: 25364 > >> > >> Modified: > >> trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/FNPPacketMangler.java > >> trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/PacketSender.java > >> trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/PeerNode.java > >> trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/RequestSender.java > >> trunk/freenet/src/freenet/support/Logger.java > >> trunk/freenet/src/freenet/support/LoggerHook.java > >> Log: > >> some untested code trying to address the lock-contention problem in the > > logger > > > > How expensive are the volatile's? > > "Free" to read on x86; and that's what matters.
Ok so in java all it means is that the compiler will do a new memory fetch on every access? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090225/0e859cd7/attachment.pgp>
