On Saturday 18 July 2009 00:00:02 Romain Dalmaso wrote:
> Let's bump this thread, I just break the 1w uptime barrier !
> 
>     * Used Java memory: 165 MiB
>     * Allocated Java memory: 185 MiB
>     * Maximum Java memory: 986 MiB
>     * Running threads: 202/5000
>     * Available CPUs: 2
>     * Java Version: 1.6.0_07
>     * JVM Vendor: The FreeBSD Foundation
>     * JVM Version: 10.0-b23
>     * OS Name: FreeBSD
>     * OS Version: 7.2-RELEASE-p1
>     * OS Architecture: i386
> 
>       Store   Cache
> Keys  360,043         3,920,557
> Capacity      3,989,551       3,989,552
> Data Size     10.9 GiB        119 GiB
> Utilization   9.0%    98.3%
> Read-Requests         2,965,449       2,820,060
> Successful Reads      145,389         227,792
> Success Rate  4.9028%         8.0776%

Ooooh, this is interesting! Your store is getting more than half the success 
rate of your cache despite being 10x smaller. Normally stores give very low 
success rates; your behaviour is more like what it *should* be ...

> Writes        13,291  446,364
> Access Rate   4.88 /sec       4.64 /sec
> Write Rate    0.02 /sec       0.73 /sec
> 
>     * bwlimitDelayTime: 0ms
>     * nodeAveragePingTime: 590ms
>     * darknetSizeEstimateSession: 68 nodes
>     * darknetSizeEstimate24h: 21 nodes
>     * darknetSizeEstimate48h: 38 nodes
>     * opennetSizeEstimateSession: 9471 nodes
>     * opennetSizeEstimate24h: 5022 nodes

Woah! Are you a seednode?

>     * opennetSizeEstimate48h: 6308 nodes
>     * nodeUptime: 1w48m
>     * routingMissDistance: 0.0440
>     * backedOffPercent: 4.2%
>     * pInstantReject: 0.0%
>     * unclaimedFIFOSize: 114
>     * RAMBucketPoolSize: 9.99 MiB / 10.0 MiB
>     * uptimeAverage: 100.0%
> 
> # Input Rate: 19.0 KiB/s (of 380 KiB/s)
> # Output Rate: 64.8 KiB/s (of 95.0 KiB/s)
> # Total Input: 22.1 GiB (38.2 KiB/s average)
> # Total Output: 35.0 GiB (60.4 KiB/s average)
> # Payload Output: 25.1 GiB (43.3 KiB/sec)(71%)

Good payload. Output is reasonable but a little disappointing.

Request success rates?
> 
> On 6/21/09, xor <xor at gmx.li> wrote:
> >
> > I have "nodeUptime: 1w1d" right now, so let's talk about statistics, they
> > have
> > changed recently:
> >
> > # opennetSizeEstimateSession: 10233 nodes
> > # opennetSizeEstimate24h: 4736 nodes
> > # opennetSizeEstimate48h: 6299 nodes
> > # routingMissDistance: 0.0792
> >
> > # Total Input: 21.5 GiB (31.8 KiB/s average)
> > # Total Output: 48.1 GiB (71.2 KiB/s average)
> >
> > Detailed timings (local CHK fetches)
> > Successful  15.295s
> > Unsuccessful        12.661s
> > Average     12.766s
> >
> > Success rates
> > Group       P(success)      Count
> > All requests        5.151%  6,773,032
> > CHKs        15.057%         2,058,489
> > SSKs        0.513%  4,714,543
> > Local requests      4.897%  1,121,112
> > Remote requests     5.068%  5,651,920
> > Block transfers     96.351%         496,477
> > Turtled downstream  87.984%         10,794
> > Transfers timed out         0.574%  10,794
> > Turtle requests     58.887%         2,048
> >
> > If you're interested in more stats just ask.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090718/774f4704/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to