Evan Daniel skrev: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Florent > Daigni?re<nextgens at freenetproject.org> wrote: >> * Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2009-07-28 20:03:42]: >>> So we need to deal with the bug tracker. But it will take several days work >>> (= approximately the cost to both FPI and Ian of emu for 1.5 months). Is >>> this really a high priority? IMHO losing our existing bugs database will >>> cost significant work in the medium to long term, hence the need to migrate >>> data... >> Last time people talked about it, only you and xor where objecting to >> trashing the bug database altogether and switching to another bug >> tracker (possibly hosted by someone else). > > As someone who has submitted a number of both feature requests and > bugs to the database, I would be right annoyed if they were simply > dropped without any plan to keep track of and address them. That > said, I have no particular attachment to the current software, and no > objection to changing to something else if would improve things.
Ditto. I don't think we are using our current bugtracker very effectively right now, but simply trashing everything seems like a bad idea to me too. However, if we are migrating anyway, it might be a good time to stop up and actually clean up the bugtracker (this was suggested earlier too). There are *tons* of outdated bugs in there and very few people that actually know enough about Freenet to do the cleaning. - Zero3
