IMHO the best way to handle this is to keep a week reference to the PeerNode, 
so we can display the current name of the node which sent the message, no?

Thinking particularly of 0f68ca45ef5521fc9b5672053f6c04bf80ae0c7f - why do we 
need to parse it out of the SFS, don't we already know the node that sent the 
message?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090730/eac296c3/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to