On Thursday 04 June 2009 12:36:31 bbackde at googlemail.com wrote: > If you really consider sf.net, someone should analyse what they > provide. And you should clearly > state what you need. The whole discussion is based on assumptions and stuff. > > Fyi: sf.net has an own donation system, but you don't have to use it. > The Frost project directly > links to paypal on its (sf.net hosted) homepage.
And this does not seem to be contrary to their AUP. I don't think the following would apply to us sending an announce mail soliciting donations via paypal?: "Using contact information obtained from SourceForge.net to solicit donations outside of the SourceForge.net Donation System is not permitted. If you have been impermissibly solicited for a donation outside of the SourceForge.net Donation System, please report the solicitation to us by sending a copy of solicitation, and if by email, include the full header in order for us to trace the pathway of the email. " -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090604/6bdcaf6a/attachment.pgp>
