On Thursday 11 June 2009 09:53:51 VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote: > > Nextgens has pointed out that this is going to make it harder to build a > > proper plugin API with no shared code and only interfaces. Any suggestions > > for how to make this easy for plugins without them having to inherit > > classes from Freenet itself? > > Why is it so bad to inherit something? Look at the design of something like > Google Android, not only do you have to inherit whole bunch of stuff, but you > are locked in the design pattern by it.
Because it makes isolating plugins from the node code via classloader hacks more difficult? Eventually we want to be able to support "untrusted" plugins... -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090611/e349ddc9/attachment.pgp>
