On Tuesday 31 March 2009 17:26:05 Daniel Cheng wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:51 AM, <infinity0 at freenetproject.org> wrote: > > Author: infinity0 > > Date: 2009-03-30 23:51:44 +0000 (Mon, 30 Mar 2009) > > New Revision: 26260 > > > > Modified: > [..] > > ?JNIEXPORT void JNICALL Java_com_onionnetworks_fec_Native16Code_nativeDecode > > - ?(JNIEnv *, jobject, jint, jobjectArray, jintArray, jintArray, jint, jint); > > + ?(JNIEnv *, jobject, jlong, jobjectArray, jintArray, jintArray, jint, jint); > > > > This is a ABI-incompatable change. > Make sure _ALL_ binary are updated before release. > > the x86 linux and x86 windows binary are outdated, as of this writing.
This is bad. Everything, including the auto-update, relies on FEC. Hopefully it will fall back on the pure java version of FEC, but is this change absolutely vital? For 32-bit i.e. could we create a separate ABI for 64-bit decodes? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090331/4609dc26/attachment.pgp>
