On Friday 01 May 2009 17:49:57 Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Friday 01 May 2009 16:38:03 xor wrote: > > On Friday 01 May 2009 16:35:22 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > IMHO all the evidence points to Bloom filter sharing as *substantially* > > > improving both speed and data reachability. I wonder if it might not be > > > possible to implement it quickly, either before 0.8, after 0.8-beta1 > > > and before 0.8, or for a quick 0.8.1/0.9? The main issues: > > > > There is a LARGE list of usability TODOs for 0.8 which should be handled > > before implementing any new features IMHO. Further bugfixing would also > > be nice. > > On the other hand, this might be feasible in a week or so, and greatly > improve performance. And IMHO performance is important.
Well yes. When exactly do you want to release 0.8? When money runs out? When Freetalk is done? If you want to release when money runs out it might be wise to help me with Freetalk development because Freetalk is in the phase where it is hard to estimate how much development time is still needed. Due to the git- switch I was not able to work on it last week, so still approx 2 weeks of daily work left - assuming that reallife does not prevent me from working on it every day. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090501/4c003c50/attachment.pgp>
